- User Since
- Jan 30 2017, 10:13 PM (33 w, 4 d)
Mon, Sep 11
Sun, Sep 10
Sun, Aug 27
Duplicate of D823
Aug 20 2017
Aug 19 2017
Aug 17 2017
Aug 15 2017
Aug 10 2017
Aug 9 2017
Aug 7 2017
this have already been updated.
Aug 6 2017
Aug 5 2017
Links below to the different licenses for this package.
Jul 9 2017
@kyrios123: Noticed no one got to my patch ealier for bind. Could you please just add my changes to your patch and I can close mine.
Jun 28 2017
Jun 26 2017
Jun 18 2017
Jun 15 2017
The custom license indicate 2 extra licenses that I can't find information about in the spdx.org list.
Added more correctly licenses
Jun 14 2017
Added test plan and a reference why we need to include this package
Jun 13 2017
May 7 2017
Noticed this was already in the loop. so closing this.
May 3 2017
May 1 2017
This is a dependency to Thrive T2545 that is already accepted for inclusion in the repositories.
Apr 26 2017
Apr 19 2017
Apr 12 2017
Mar 12 2017
Mar 11 2017
Mar 10 2017
@JoshStrobl do the triage team catch this change or shall I change any status for it now that I have fixed the request?
Mar 6 2017
Mar 2 2017
No worries, just wanted to close this since you patched it up. And thanks for the info regarding the comar stuff that can't yet be moved to ypkg. This info would be good in the packaging documentation page if not already there.
@ikey I guess I can go ahead and close this since you updated gtk3 to 3.22.9 today. Or is this something just the Triage Team do?
Mar 1 2017
Feb 27 2017
Feb 24 2017
Shall I leave this here open for you to grab when you feel the timing to be right and move parent task to "waiting for fixes"?
Feb 23 2017
Will need to update systemd to >= 220 as dependency
@ikey and @JoshStrobl Thank you for both of your response. This is what I like with this project, the open discussions that are constructive. I also thank you for your acknowledgement of what me and the others have contributed to the project. It means a lot. For now I will focus on some of the packages requests that have been accepted for inclusion.
fair enough, I think it was your condescending comment that got me triggered. Would have been better just to mention that it would be better to slow of the patch sending until you have fixed T2616 to make it easier for you approving and us to contribute. I would not even mind if it was put low priority as you did. I think it was your comment that made me feel that I was wasting my time. Which is bad since up until now I have learned a lot of your packaging guidelines and have found it fun to contribute with what I can assist with. Because I really like this project and what its headed.
I know that you are a small team to go through all these patch requests and its hard to keep everything rolling. I thought I was helping with these patch requests, but after reading your comment I feel that I might just step down and just be an normal user and use my spare time to something else that feels more meaningfull.
Feb 22 2017
Thanks will keep this in mind.
Updated patch with suggested changes.
Updated patch with the suggested changes.
nvm saw that you moved it to awaiting fixes. I will update the patch.
@JoshStrobl You want me to update the patch or do you fix the zlib part?